July 12, 2010
-
The Abolition Of Man!
(Day 6: Your Favourite Music Video.)
(There will be no comment on this one. For one thing I don’t really have one. There are many music videos I enjoy but I’m so much more about the songs than the videos. More so, when the subject discussed in this update becomes evident I think you’ll agree it hardly would be appropriate to feature one anyway…)
Nathan and I spent the weekend in Hiroshima. Two very polarised days. The first was good fun. We both got going early and were in Hiroshima by 10:30 am. We spent most of the day at Miyajima, just taking in the sights and walking round the island. That evening we had pizza at a tucked-away little Italian food-place that I can only describe as “High Class Steam Punk!” We’d not booked a hotel so opted for the bare-bones approach; manga cafe. For those not familiar with Japan a manga cafe is like a huge library full of manga, also containing small booths with internet access, that operate 24 hours. Whilst bed-less and bathroom-less they do allow for large reclining chairs and, at less than 2000 yen for 8 hours (just enough to see us through from midnight to 8 the next morning) we took it. Not the most comfortable of nights… but not the most uncomfortable either.
The next day it was on to the heavy stuff; the A-Bomb Dome, Peace Park and Museum. Though it was Nathan’s first visit it was my second to the Memorial Museum and it left an impression the first time. This time was far more profound for me, however, for one simple reason. Looking at the map a building not 200 metres from the centre of the explosion was identified as an elementary school. A school that would have been full of kids just like the kids I see everyday. There were of course more elementaries and junior highs, not unlike my own, throughout Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Kids, just like my own, were incinerated instantaneously. Some had their skin seared away by the heat of the blast and died agonising and painful deaths as they wandered the streets in search of help they’d never find. Some survived for years, even decades, only to die from the damage the radiation cause their bodies. It is a common lamentation of mine that we only truly understand the suffering of others when it becomes personal for us. But in light of how severely it affects us when it does we all have a duty to empathise, to stop distancing ourselves from any suffering that does not touch us personally. To, at the very least, show kindness and compassion to those whose hardships we don’t understand or appreciate.
But that is not my point. What I took from that day was two-fold. Firstly, the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were a war crime. A war crime as heinous in nature as the evils the Japanese Imperial Army and the Nazis inflicted. The Nanking Massacre, Unit 731, Concentration Camps, the Holocaust; they were all war crimes of an utterly detestable nature and those responsible were tried as war criminals. But history is written by the victors and no such accountability lies in wait for the Allied leaders who decided to unleash the power of a small star on the men, women and children of two cities in August 1945. Harry S. Truman was a war criminal. Winston Churchill was an accessory to war crimes. Viler still, Nathan informs me that a survey taken amongst the American public shortly after the war ended turned out a shocking 25% in favour of further atomic bombings of Japan. The world today stands outraged at the attempted genocide of the Jews. Yet sizable parties amongst our own Allied Forces, the forces combatting this evil, were calling for the complete eradication of Japan.
My second point. In trying to identify what terrifying evils exist in the heart of man to allow such inhumanity to his own kind I’ve identified one pivotal factor; empathy. Or, to be precise, lack thereof. War makes a necessity out of dehumanising one’s enemy. Propaganda designed to remove any trace of empathy for our fellow man is employed throughout wartime, turning our adversary into vile, inhuman monsters, enemies to civilised society and our very way of life. It is not hard, through the lens of the Victor’s History, to view ourselves as the heroes. And, ideologically, I find it hard not to too. We were opposing the totalitarian fascism and genocidal insanity of Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy. The imperialist Manifest Destiny and religiously nationalistic zeal of Japan. But when you look beyond the ideologies to the actual actions the waters become muddy. Political posturing and militaristic dominion played puppeteer to America’s decision to utilise its newfound nuclear capabilities. The war could have been ended without the bombs. But the Soviets were closing in. Their involvement in Japan would mean further footholds for Communist Russia following the war’s end. Money and time had been invested to create these weapons. Germany had capitulated. And outside of a wartime setting the use of a nuclear weapon on living human subjects would be considered an act of inhuman evil. Money and political maneuverings led to the decision to annihilate over a hundred thousand lives. And this was from “the good guys.” The only way one can commit such atrocities, outside of being a sociopath, is to willfully dehumanise your foe. To cut yourself off from them, to see them as “other.” To deny yourself the burden of empathy. But they are human. They are very human. They are flesh and blood. They are parents, children, brothers, sisters, friends, lovers. They laugh, they cry, they love, they fear, they hurt.
I went to school today and saw several hundred Japanese children, aged between 6 and 12. At lunch time the 2nd graders wanted to play with me, asking for piggy-back rides and shoulder-carries, trying to hang off my arms, giving me hugs, laughing, chatting, playing. Now I imagine them dead, charred bodies lifelessly strewn across a barren earth. Everything that was their lives annihilated. I imagine an incredibly sweet little 7 year old girl, named Toa, immolated beyond recognition, screaming and crying for help in a manner so terrible it freezes the blood. Now I imagine the justifications of the politicians, the celebrations of the public at the destruction of their enemy, and I feel physically sick. I force myself to think of these things, to imagine such a terrible pain so close to myself, for one reason; because it is the truth. It is the absolute truth of what has happened and people all-too easily seek to avoid it and that is how these atrocities come to pass. Remember 9/11? Remember the scenes of celebration in the streets of those Arab nations we saw on TV? Remember how it made you feel? Now kindly take a moment to realise that our own countries knowingly brought down devastation of a magnitude many times greater than 10 9/11s and, whilst the still-living remains of a mother amidst the black rain and charred landscape of a nuclear wasteland the likes of which we’ve only seen in movies stood over a river choked with the immolated corpses of men, women and children screaming her son’s name, our people cheered.
What makes a monster? I would argue it is not one’s actions but how one allows oneself to commit them. Hitler’s persecution of the Jews was only possible because he closed himself to their humanity, and indoctrinated others to do the same. But whilst our nations fought this evil we were actively committing the same evil ourselves. But it is not always so blatant as the wartime propaganda that fueled the fires of genocide. It still happens now, day-to-day. Every bigoted remark, every line drawn in the sand, every nationalistic proclamation of one’s country or people over anothers, every denial of another person’s rights, every perception of ‘them VS us.’ I am not usually one for the “slippery slope” argument but consider this; these lines of thinking are the seeds from which the world’s most terrible evils have sprouted. When one closes one’s heart to others, when one dehumanises another to the extent that they no longer are capable of feeling for them, when one sees others as only monsters, that is when we become monsters ourselves.
Peace.
Comments (8)
Amen
Absolutely agreed. I am constantly astounded at mankind’s inability to empathise with others, and I think that the definition of war crime is so skewed that people can’t even see the obvious! I have always believed that soldiers can’t be held accountable for their actions in a time of war because it is the most extreme situation. To fight to defend one’s country and people is one of the heights of bravery, but there is meant to be honour in war; kill only armed and able bodied men, and wars should be won with minimal casualties on both sides. When these rules are bent or broken, we compromise on our morals, and the bombing of Japan is a perfect example of this. The fact that so many viewed it as a victory is sad indeed. This was a loss for mankind.
I think that the word “dehumanize” is a bit too extreme and thus far from what we have experience with in our lives. I believe that the problem is much more pernicious.
It is a problem that is in part hard-wired, or at least has a very big influence, in the human psyche, on many levels and that we experience and are perpetrators of everyday. I am talking about belogning to a group, and how groups, by definition are exclusive, and, thus, create, at various levels, a feeling of us-versus-them.
This is so ingrained in what it is to be human that it is virtually unimaginable to have a society without groups that seperate people.
Countries, Languages, Cultures, Religions, Social classes…
All the way down to everyday life… Favorite Soccer/Cricket team.
I think the human brain evolved in such a way to have a predisposition to lump people into groups, more precicely Us and Them.
There is no need to dehumanize a target or make them a monster. Oh, its more simple and unconscious than that. they are different, they do not stand for what we stand for. Their idea of what is right and wrong is skewered. They are strange. They do not believe in our god. They are rooting for the New York Yankees, but we want the Red Socks to win, etc.
No need to make them not human, only need to make them not part of your in-group. And it all starts from there.
@Sarven
Honour in war…Its actually one of the cliche concepts I want to believe in and often play up on when doing RPGs..However, call me cynical, but I think in today’s world the idea of fighting a war honourably is impossible. We are not talking about two nations of 500 soldiers fighting a battle with bows and swords on a plain.We are talking about probably tens of thousand of soldiers on each sides, with tactical weapons, planes, stealth capabilities.
Coupled with a strong desire to win, and probably a very low confidence that the enemy will not use “dirty” tactics against them. And if the ennemy uses such dirty tactics, then you are justified to use such against them, are you not? In fact, why not just stage something to give you justification to use such tactics?
With todays technology, It only takes one mistake from one soldier to cause a slaughter, whether the higher-ups were planning it or not. Also soldiers are drilled to.. well.. fight and not ask questions. Somehow I doubt that their formation focused so much on Honnour, Bravery, Good, Fairness, Righteousness and Mercy. They are there to attack, protect, guard by seeking out and dealing with enemies.
And as war goes on, people get into the war mindset. Us-vs-Them becomes stronger. Your friend got killed in front of your eyes and since he was very close to you it justifies, in your hurt wartime mind, getting revenge on as many Thems as possible.
And the cycle continues because every Them you kill has a friend, like you, who is going to fight doubly hard to get revenge/closure/justice/honnour by killing you. But you dont see that. You just see a bunch of crazy Thems running at you with guns.
Honnour is realistically best left to games, roleplaying, duels, and organised fights, like you have in martial arts.
where did five go?
this is definitely a big reason why i don’t like ethnocentrism. it’s all a clever way to dehumanize everyone else, to set your kind above the rest. i’ve never really liked any such display, even in small things like sporting events. (american) football was even designed to be a metaphor for war — how fun!
except… i do like the red sox. and the yankees suck in the bad way. but i think @ShinRaijin makes a great point.
i’m sorry that this took such a large toll on you. not to say i’m sorry for the experience nor that i think it was an overreaction. certainly not. i don’t think i could have handled it, and i’d probably try to separate myself from it as much as possible. i’m simultaneously impressed and horrified (not quite the right word) that you’ve taken it to such levels. but i’m still sorry, in an “i feel you” sort of way. and you’re right. i think war of any sort is a crime, and while it does matter who started it, it doesn’t exonerate those who finish it (in this case) either.
i just typed out and deleted a rather lengthy paragraph about current events and wars in the middle east and wars in our homes about basic human rights, and i’m just getting too worked up about it. sometimes i think the title of this post would just be a good idea. it’s funny to me that people think we’ve come so far from the caveman days, when really we’ve just come up with more efficient means to club each other over the head, to push each other down and step on each other on our way to building ourselves up. being home again and being immersed in some of these attitudes again has really knocked the wind out of me.
@ShinRaijin - Oh, I’m not doubting the problem is hardwired into us. We humans are a maelstrom of sometimes useful, but dangerously indiscriminate, evolutionary cues that operate on a purely instinctual level, constantly at odds with our evolved intellects which seek to understand and reason. But I wasn’t gonna get into that in this post. I got another one on the go to touch on that. Much of what you have to say here is the same point I’m trying to make.
I do however not think “dehumanise” is at all extreme. “Dehumanise” means “to strip of human qualities.” This is something we all do to a degree as our empathy never allows us to perceive the world as acutely through another’s eyes as it does our own. We ourselves are, in our own minds, the height of human experience because we are the only human experience we have ever known. Thus everyone else is slightly less than human to us, in a manner of speaking. Hence it is all too easy for us set up groups, draw lines in the sand, do all the things we both listed ranging from outright war to which sports team you support. It’s all based on who come the closest to matching our own experience, be it via any one of those things you listed and more. It’s natural and it’s not always a bad thing, taken reasonably. But when “dehumanising” occurs we overstep the boundaries of reason. We willfully stop ourselves from seeing the others in question as being anything like us. This happened to frightening degrees during WW2, the subject of my post. Jews were portrayed as devil-like, invoking ingrained religious imagery to strip them of their humanity in the eyes of the German public. Japanese were portrayed as, among other things, slobbering apes, monkeys and even ants by American propagandists. Dehumanisation does happen and to vile extents. I’m not saying that I’d lob the term “dehumanised” around at something as simple as opposing football teams and, like I said, I’m not usually one for the whole “slippery slope” argument… but they are part of the same line of reaction. What I am saying is there are those who would willingly close themselves to others humanity and those who take a moment to stop and remember that those on the other side of the fence are, at their core, made of the same stuff we are. Those who do the former are the ones who enable monsters.
@mercurialmusic - It’s just my way to personalise it. But it’s true, I don’t have to personalise these things so much. I choose to. I choose to because, as I’ve said, that’s the reality. Maybe not for me, but for someone, at some time. I feel I owe it to them, as a fellow human being, to, in some small way, know their pain. Even just a fraction of it. To shut myself off to it is to insult them and kill off a little more of my own humanity in the process. I’m fine, though. It’s not like I really did live through it.
@mercurialmusic - oh, and 5 was the last update. it’s 4 I missed; favourite book(s)
we all know what they are, though
@moss_icon - =)